Organizations that stopped surviving and started working
CASE STUDY 01
A capacity problem that was really a survival problem
CASE STUDY 02
A growth ambition that revealed a hidden business
CASE STUDY 01
A capacity problem that was really a survival problem
SUMMARY
A self-funded social enterprise kept turning away clients because the team couldn't keep pace with demand. The CEO's answer was to hire. The Head of Operations was already holding the entire delivery system together manually, and adding headcount would have made the organization more fragile, not less. Our research revealed something more urgent underneath—the firm was losing money on every engagement. Effort wasn't the problem. The system was.
WHAT WAS TRUE
The service was roughly 80% custom on every project—expensive to produce, impossible to staff reliably, and inconsistent for clients. There were no systems for onboarding, project management, or quality control. Senior people were buried in routine work with no time to improve anything. The firm was generating a maximum of $83 per hour of staff time and had no mechanism to change that.
WHAT WORKED
We uncovered the real problem and got the team invested in solving it. Then, we redesigned how the firm worked as one connected system while:
Standardizing the service without eliminating the flexibility clients valued. The ratio flipped from 80% custom to 80% standard, with a streamlined customization layer on top.
Building operational infrastructure so the team had what they needed to deliver consistent work without the head of operations holding everything together.
Launched an apprenticeship program that solved the capacity problem, built a talent pipeline for future full-time roles, and produced intellectual property that was then used to develop an additional high-margin service.
OUTCOMES
Financial performance: Revenue grew 10x while headcount only doubled.
Stakeholder experience: Client and participant satisfaction consistently hit 9/10 — across every project, regardless of who staffed it.
Operational alignment: The team had clarity. Each full-time consultant could lead 3x more projects. Trained facilitators grew 8x. Geographic reach expanded without increasing overhead.
Leadership focus: The Head of Operations stopped being the connective tissue and the system held on its own and was able to shift focus toward building the future of the company.
CASE STUDY 02
A growth ambition that revealed a hidden business
SUMMARY
After over a decade in business, this social enterprise's leadership had ambitious plans—dominate the industry and become a major brand. But the harder they pushed, the clearer it became that effort wasn't the answer. The Founder was holding the company together. The team was burning out. Clients were paying premium prices and still dissatisfied. The infrastructure couldn't support growth. It could barely support the company’s existing operations.
WHAT WAS TRUE
The firm had no documented identity—no vision, mission, or values—leaving the team without a shared strategy or basis for decisions. Clients saw parts of the service as slow and unnecessary, even as they were paying 2-3x above market rates. The delivery team spent more than 20% of their time on activities that added no value for the client, operated without clear standards, and didn't feel safe raising concerns. Average employee tenure was less than one year. The vast majority of projects ended with the outcomes clients paid for, but many clients were still dissatisfied.
Research revealed two distinct problems that required two distinct tracks. We worked on both simultaneously.
To stabilize the business:
Established the firm's first identity framework—vision, mission, and values—giving the company an anchor for strategy and the team a foundation for alignment and decision-making
Standardized the core service with client-persona-driven adaptations and defined quality standards
Built a sales system with new materials and a revised pricing strategy
Redesigned part of service delivery to incorporate AI, reducing workload, improving consistency, and evening out how demand hit the team
To find the path forward:
We tested three prototype directions with real clients. Two didn't hold, which the prototyping process revealed quickly, protecting the firm from costly misdirection. The third surfaced capabilities the firm didn't know it had. It pointed to an entirely new business concept grounded in what the firm was already exceptional at.
WHAT WORKED
OUTCOMES
Financial performance: Revenue grew 39% year over year. Per-project costs dropped 87% while maintaining quality and accelerating client timelines.
Stakeholder experience: Clients moved faster and reported less friction. The service became something the team could deliver consistently, not heroically.
Operational alignment: The core business was stabilized. A new business concept, built on existing capabilities, showed early market promise. Zero regrettable attrition during the transformation—a meaningful shift for a firm that had struggled to retain people for years.
Leadership focus: Leadership was able to put their energy into developing the new business concept with less time spent managing the day-to-day. The founder stopped being the only thing holding the company together.
See if this is right for you
Free 1-hour working session for executives ready to make a change.